Choosing the Right System
Miles had first used Ticketsolve earlier in his career at a theatre in Bedford. When it came to upgrading systems at subsequent venues, he didn't need to look far. Many larger ticketing providers required minimum income thresholds, long contracts, or came loaded with functionality that smaller venues simply didn't need. For theatres with 180–300 seats, the priority was professional tooling without unnecessary overhead.
Ticketsolve offered exactly that: and crucially, the investment could be structured to be cost neutral. By setting booking fees appropriately, venues could cover system costs per ticket sold, avoiding large upfront expenses and removing pressure on operational budgets.
"It's not cheap, but it's not unaffordable either. For us, it's effectively cost neutral."
The onboarding process included data migration, implementation support, and system setup, and proved far simpler than expected. From initial enquiry to going live took around three months. Existing shows were migrated successfully, and data transfer was seamless.
"Sunday night export. Monday morning everything was there. By Tuesday everything was correct."

.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)




